Home › Guides

Which Instagram numbers matter for a small business?

The ones that follow a stranger from seeing you to doing something about it: how many of the people who interacted with a post do not already follow you, how many of them went to your profile, and how many of those then followed you or tapped your link. Each one feeds the next, and together they answer what a small business is really asking, which is whether Instagram is bringing anybody new. The first is on Instagram's own screen: for posts, stories and Live, Insights breaks accounts engaged down into followers and non-followers. Read them against your own account a month ago rather than against somebody else's screenshot. Doing exactly that on a buyer's account is one chapter of our Instagram audit.

Insights gives you a screen full of numbers and most of them will never change a decision you make. Below are the ones we look at, in the order we look at them.

Follower count is who could see you, not who did

It sits in the biggest font on your profile and it is the last thing to move, which is an unkind combination for anyone checking it on a Tuesday night. It counts people who agreed to something once, and some of them have not opened the app this year.

A follow happens after somebody saw a post, liked what they saw enough to tap your name, then read your profile and decided. Three things had to go right and the follower count reports only the last one. If you want it to climb, the work sits in the numbers before it.

Look at it monthly. Never per post.

The split under accounts engaged is the first thing to check

Insights counts who saw a post in two ways. Views is, in Instagram's words, "the number of times your content was played or displayed", so the same person coming back for another look counts twice. Viewers is "the number of unique accounts that have seen your content on screen at least once", which is the number you will often see called reach. That is usually why the two do not match. If views is missing from your screen, Instagram says the metric "is being gradually introduced and may not be available to you yet".

The split is what tells you whether anybody new turned up, and Instagram says where it is: "For posts, stories and Instagram Live, you can see the Accounts engaged metric broken down into followers and non-followers." Accounts engaged is, in Instagram's words, "the number of unique accounts that have interacted with your content", so the split counts the people who did something with a post. Set a long window rather than last week, because one quiet Wednesday moves a week and moves nothing over three months. Instagram says "you can choose to view insights for the last 7, 14, 30 or 90 days".

If nearly everybody reacting to your posts already follows you, what you have is a newsletter. There is nothing wrong with a newsletter, and your existing followers are usually the ones who buy things. But nobody new is arriving, and a business needs the other half of that bar to exist. If the non-follower half used to be there and has fallen away, why has my Instagram reach dropped goes through the usual causes.

Profile visits are where your content hands over to your profile

A profile visit is somebody tapping your name and landing on your page. It is the moment a post has finished its job and your bio takes over, and it is the number the owners we work with check least.

Read follows against profile visits, not against viewers. Out of everybody who came for a look, how many stayed. That one comparison separates two problems that feel identical from the outside. Plenty of visits and almost no follows means the content is working and the profile is losing them: the fix is your bio, your highlights and the top row of your grid. Barely any visits means nobody is getting far enough to be lost, and the fix is the content.

Link taps sit one step further along, the last thing that happens before anybody can book, buy or enquire. If that number is flat, check how often you ask anybody to tap it before you blame the link.

Saves and shares over comments, comments over likes

Instagram publishes what it tries hardest to predict, and the lists differ across the app. In Reels it names how likely you are to "reshare a reel, watch a reel all the way through, like it, and go to the audio page". In Explore it says the most important actions it predicts include "likes, saves, and shares".

Nobody outside the platform knows how any of that is weighted, and anyone who tells you what a save is worth next to a like is guessing. What the lists are good for is direction. A like costs a thumb. A comment costs a sentence. A save is somebody deciding to keep your post. A share is somebody putting their own name to it in front of their friends.

So the useful move is to build the reason to keep or pass it on into the thing itself: a checklist, the answer to the question your customers ask you every week.

Watch time and the retention chart

On a reel, Instagram gives you watch time, "the total amount of time your reel was played, including any time spent replaying the reel", and average watch time, which it calculates as "the watch time divided by the number of initial views". It has also announced a retention chart, "now available within your reels' insights", that shows "how many people are watching" a reel "on a moment-by-moment basis". The chart starts with everybody who pressed play and falls away as they go, so the steepest part of that line is the second you lost them.

A drop right at the front, before you have finished a sentence, is your opening, and why do people scroll past my reels in the first second is about that on its own. A line that holds and then sags means the opening worked and the middle is where the work is.

What "good" looks like, and why we will not hand you a target

Every article that gives you a target either invented it or averaged a pile of accounts nothing like yours. A wedding photographer, a florist and a physio have different base rates for every number on this page, and so do two florists in different suburbs.

Published averages do exist, and there is one on our audit page with both studies it came from linked, because knowing what ordinary looks like is steadying when you are convinced you are the only one flatlining. That is what it is for. It is not a target.

Your comparison is your own account over a longer window. One post tells you close to nothing. Eight weeks of posts tells you which pillars pull, which openings earn saves, and what happens when you skip a fortnight.

Ten minutes, once a week

Pick a day and keep it. Open Insights, set the window wider than the last seven days, and look at four things: the follower and non-follower split under accounts engaged, your profile visits, your follows against those visits, and the retention chart on the reel that did least.

Then write two lines somewhere you will find them again. What moved, and what you did differently. Do that for a couple of months and you will have the only report about your account that is about your account. Checking it hourly does nothing except make you miserable. If you want the rest of the routine written out, the pillars, the batching session and the weekly checklist, it is all in our free guide Scroll Less, Grow More.

What a number will not tell you

Every one of these is a symptom. They tell you what happened and never why, and the why is a judgement somebody makes with the posts open beside the numbers.

That is what an audit is for. You send your handle, screenshots of your Insights and a few lines about the business, about ten minutes of work, and we sit with the numbers and the posts together. What comes back is which of your numbers is saying something, the post or the pattern behind each one, and what to change first, in order, with nothing in the document we cannot point at a post or a figure to justify. It is A$300 once, no membership attached, and it lands within 5 business days of your details reaching us, written as your own private page that stays yours. The Doomscrollers Handbook, A$50 on its own, comes with it. There is a full example report on the site if you would rather read one before you decide.

Questions people ask

Also asked

The ones that follow a stranger from seeing you to doing something about it, in order: how many of the accounts that interacted with a post do not already follow you, how many of them visited your profile, and how many of those then followed you or tapped your link. Saves and shares matter next, because both take a deliberate decision, and the retention chart on a reel tells you where people left it. Read every one of them against your own account a month ago rather than against a published average.

On Instagram's own insights the two are views and viewers. Viewers counts the separate accounts that saw your content on screen at least once, and it is the number you will often see called reach. Views counts every time it was played or displayed, including the same person coming back for another look. That is why the two rarely match. Viewers tells you roughly how many people you got in front of; views tells you how much your work was seen. The split worth checking sits on a third number: Instagram puts followers and non-followers on accounts engaged, for posts, stories and Live, which counts the accounts that interacted with your content.

It is worth a look once a month and not much more than that. Follower count is who could see you rather than who did, and it moves last: somebody has to see a post, tap your name, read your profile and decide, and only the final step shows up in that number. If you want it to climb, the useful work sits in the numbers before it, which are the follower split under accounts engaged, your profile visits and how many of those visits turn into follows.

They tell you more, because they cost more. A like takes a thumb; a save is someone deciding to keep your post, and a share is someone putting their own name to it in front of their friends. Instagram publishes what it tries hardest to predict in each part of the app, and the lists differ by surface, so nobody outside the platform can tell you what a save is worth next to a like. What you can act on is the direction: build a reason to keep or pass on a post into the post itself.

There is no honest single number, and any article that gives you one either invented it or averaged a pile of accounts nothing like yours. A wedding photographer, a florist and a physio have different base rates, and so do two florists in different suburbs. Published averages are useful for knowing what an ordinary account looks like and useless as a target. The comparison that works is your own account over a longer window: eight weeks of your own posts will tell you more than any benchmark.